Lactate threshold models

Enter your stage values, compare the models and look at the training zones. You can replace the pre-filled example values with your own.

Calculated in your browser · no transmission · no storage · no sign-up

Measurements

Test type
Stage values of the test
StageLoad WLactate mmol/lHR bpmRemove
1
2
3
4
5
6
7

Calculations run only in your browser. Your measurements are not sent anywhere.

Lactate curve & thresholds

IAS · aerobic148 W

1.4 mmol/l

IANS · anaerobic225 W

2.8 mmol/l

Analysis modelDickhuth

Choose in the model comparison below

024681012mmol/l100140180220260300340Wbpm80110140170200IAS 148IANS 225
Exponential (a + b·eᶜˣ). Lactate. Heart rate. Range of the anaerobic threshold across all models. Selected model. The lines do not coincide because the methods define different points on the same curve as the threshold. This is not a measurement error.

Depending on the model, the anaerobic threshold lies between 210 and 257 watts. That is a range of 47 watts (22.5 %).

Choose a model: it sets the highlighted line and the training zones
Aerobic
148 W
Anaerobic
210 W2.4 mmol/l · 152 bpm

Practice heuristic, not published

Aerobic
190 W
Anaerobic
257 W4.0 mmol/l · 169 bpm

Heck et al. 1985 (original publication, opens in a new window)

Aerobic
148 W
Anaerobic
225 W2.8 mmol/l · 158 bpm

Dickhuth et al. 1991 (original publication, opens in a new window)

Aerobic
—
Anaerobic
251 W3.8 mmol/l · 167 bpm

Bishop et al. 1998 (original publication, opens in a new window)

Aerobic
200 W
Anaerobic
only one threshold by design

Beaver et al. 1985 (original publication, opens in a new window)

Aerobic
—
Anaerobic
238 W3.2 mmol/l · 162 bpm

Cheng et al. 1992 (original publication, opens in a new window)

Training zones

Calculated from the threshold according to Dickhuth. The boundaries are fixed percentages of the threshold load. Other zone models set them differently.

ZoneLoad (W)Heart rate
Recoveryup to 135up to 122 bpm
Basic endurance training 1135–165122–134 bpm
Basic endurance training 2165–210134–152 bpm
Basic endurance training 3210–237152–162 bpm
Competition-specific endurancefrom 237from 162 bpm

What the numbers mean.

The range is the real insight

If you calculate the same test with several methods, you immediately see what a single report does not show: the models diverge, sometimes by 20 per cent of the threshold power or more2,3. This is not a measurement error. The models simply define the same transition differently.

In practice this means: a threshold value without the method stated is no use for comparisons over time. And if you switch the model between two tests, you see a development that never happened4.

Which model for what

In practice, four questions help with the choice: Which method was used for this person’s previous reports? What data does your protocol provide? Which sport and which performance level are involved? And which external values must the report remain comparable with? The article Lactate threshold models compared explains this in detail.

The calculation does not follow the original publication in every respect. D-Max and modified D-Max evaluate the measured stage points directly here, without fitting a polynomial curve. The log-log regression uses power instead of oxygen uptake. This adaptation of Beaver’s method is common in the literature. So if you compare results with other software, you are not necessarily comparing the same calculation rule.

From threshold to zones

The zones at the bottom of the calculator are percentages of the threshold power. Important, because it is often misunderstood: in the diagnostics model used here, the threshold lies within the threshold zone. Other zone models draw the boundaries differently. The article Calculating training zones from a lactate test explains how the zones are derived and where their limits lie.

What the calculator cannot do

It does not know your protocol. Stage duration, load increment, sampling time and whether the resting value was taken before the warm-up also affect the result. The calculator does not check these conditions. The article Lactate step test: protocol, stage duration and termination criteria explains what makes a reliable protocol.

Frequently asked questions

Why do the models produce different thresholds?
Because each model looks for a differently defined point on the same curve: a fixed lactate concentration, a distance from the resting value, the minimum of the lactate equivalent or the greatest distance from a reference line. None of the calculation models is regarded as the gold standard1. The physiological reference criterion is usually the maximal lactate steady state (MLSS)5.
Are the values I enter stored?
No. The calculation runs entirely in your browser. Nothing is sent to a server, nothing is stored and nothing is logged.
Does the calculator calculate exactly like Plenea?
Yes. It uses the same calculation library as the product, not a re-implementation. However, the results also depend on inputs, configuration and version. And the same library does not replace a professional review.
Why does log-log not show a second threshold?
Because Beaver’s method defines only one threshold by design. So an empty field here does not mean that data is missing.
Can I use the result as a report?
No. The calculator produces model results and does not check how the test was carried out. A report requires a documented protocol, an assessment of measurement quality and professional approval.

Sources

  1. 1

    Faude O, Kindermann W, Meyer T. Lactate threshold concepts: how valid are they? Sports Medicine. 2009;39(6):469–490.

    ReviewDOI 10.2165/00007256-200939060-00003PubMed 19453206

  2. 2
  3. 3

    Bishop D, Jenkins DG, Mackinnon LT. The relationship between plasma lactate parameters, Wpeak and 1-h cycling performance in women. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 1998;30(8):1270–1275.

    Original researchDOI 10.1097/00005768-199808000-00014PubMed 9710868

  4. 4

    Heuberger JAAC, Gal P, Stuurman FE, de Muinck Keizer WAS, Mejia Miranda Y, Cohen AF. Repeatability and predictive value of lactate threshold concepts in endurance sports. PLoS One. 2018;13(11):e0206846.

    Original researchDOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0206846PubMed 30427900

  5. 5

    Jones AM, Burnley M, Black MI, Poole DC, Vanhatalo A. The maximal metabolic steady state: redefining the 'gold standard'. Physiological Reports. 2019;7(10):e14098.

    ReviewDOI 10.14814/phy2.14098PubMed 31124324

Specialist information on the methods of performance diagnostics. The output is a model result, not a report. No medical advice, no diagnosis and no substitute for assessment by qualified professionals.

Six models on the same raw data.

In Plenea, the choice of model during analysis is documented as a professional decision. You also get the source for each method, the history across several tests and traceable reference values for the zones.